There’s a double standard. Just because David didn’t say he didn’t want his children photographed and never hid them I don’t think it’s more ok to pist pictures of them. But I don’t think it’s worse to pist pictures of Gillian’s children just because she has sort of kept them out of pictures until now. I just don’t think the children should be plastered online for everyone to see. When kids have such rich parents they live under a bigger threat to not so good people who want get money.

I guess everyone has their own policy on their own blog. I, for example,  try to avoid posting pictures from the kids’ social media, even if they’re public. I made a few exception when David was on some of West’s Snapchat, but I usually try to crop her or something. In general, I don’t feel comfortable posting those. For me, this is totally different from candids. Of course, we could pretend they don’t exist, but that won’t stop the press to buy them, and they have a stronger impact than any of our blogs here. 

I don’t see the problem of posting those candids. They’re nothing wrong on them, everyone has their clothes on and everyone is looking good. Gillian wasn’t going to keep those boys hidden forever, and I actually see one advantage of posting them. As a Gillovny blog, you can assume that I, sometimes, gets crazy comments and asks about the secrecy that was surrounding them. I guess now everyone can see that those conspiracy theories were completely unfounded and silly. That’s something.

Laisser un commentaire