altaircolin:

gunningforabasementoffice:

I went to check the full post and I can’t even voice how many things in it are incorrect.  I don’t even know where to start with addressing it except to say that this wasn’t some one-off where Gillian suddenly appeared on the arm of a man. She arrived alone and walked the red carpet alone.  In Hollywood, regardless of your personal opinion, that says something.  It says, the person came alone. But just as importantly, Gillian attends Golden Globes after-parties regularly.  The last few years have shown us that.  She’s attended the GGs before, as well.  So for someone to say they flew from the UK together (which is a ridiculous conclusion to come and not factual) to attend the GGs is ridiculous.  It can almost be guaranteed that Gillian was going to be there anyway, based on the last few years.  

“Lots of pics” is such an exaggeration that I can’t even put into words how what I think about that.  There was a very brief video of them separately on the red carpet, then PM falling into line beside her.  There was video of The Crown table when they won their award.  There was video of Gillian leaving with PM to attend the after-party.  As for pictures, there were many of Gillian solo, and a few (I think there were four, to be specific) of them at the after-party.  Pictures which showed nothing even remotely romantic, no heart eyes, and nothing but a combination of detached coldness and professional interaction.  PM gave his phone and his award more attention than the woman who was supposedly his date (and, according to plenty of people, the future stepmother of his children and future wife).  

Also, for a group of bloggers who repeatedly talk about how everyone should be careful with their words, I found the wording the OP used in that anon answer to be intentionally misleading.  That’s only my perception, but to me it read that there were a bunch of photos of Gillian and PM taken upon arriving, during and after the GGs and that they were all of them together.  For people who aren’t inclined to do their own research, that would send the wrong message and intentionally colours the narrative in their favour.  Sure, it’s their blog and they’re entitled to say what they want.  But since they complain about every narrative from the Gillovny side that you can imagine, I don’t think it’s too much to expect that a simple sentence that should be accurate and descriptive be presented as such. 

What the OP said was intentionally misleading – and yes, in other words, a lie. There’s a way to communicate information without insidiously directing readers to agree with you in an attempt to shore up more support.  But the times that I’ve made the mistake of looking at their posts, I realize that expecting that is expecting far too much.

Keep to your standards, because judging from your ask, they’re obviously in the right place.

I should call out this person for lying too. She likes saying that Gillian and PM were together at several events… 🙄🤔