Basically, in the first inference, GA is putting herself in the shoes of a childless single woman. If I was xyz(you) I would do this. The second inference is a hypothetical contrary to the current scenario. If I was single right now and was childless, I would do this. The second one gurantees that she’s dating someone. The first not necessarily. So, it can be taken either way. Though I am tilting slightly towards her slipping it in that she’s not single anymore.
–
That’s a lot of mind-twisting 🙂 I think she’s not single, that’s what she meant.
The thing is, it’s a written interview, so we will never know. Things get added to written interviews, Elle isn’t a very cautious and serious paper, so there’s also a possibility she’d never pronounced those words. It’s possible she only mentioned her kids, and the journalists made a little addition based on what they thought they knew, on what they read or whatever. Who knows!