Gillian Anderson’s Insta Story
Étiquette : gillian anderson
USA TODAY Life #BookmarkThis live chat with Gillian Anderson and Jennifer Nadel
Stupid question but I wonder why Gillian wears her glasses non stop lately. She looks gorgeous with them and if there is an X-Files s11 I hope we get a scene with them (Scully with glasses is love) but I just wonder if it is to have a more professional look for her book promo or she has an eye allergy or something.
Actually, Gillian wears glasses for like 20 years, so I don’t think it has anything to do with looking more serious or allergy. They’re prescription. She’s myopic. And I’m all for Scully in glasses. Actually, I’m all for a blond Scully in glasses!
CTRL, ALT, DELETE Podcast: #65 Gillian Anderson & Jennifer Nadel – Emma Gannon
Gillian Anderson & Jennifer Nadel
The Crown twitter account following only 44 others acc. Those are London buildings, museums, history, royal family, netflix, only 2 actors from series, filmmakers from the Crown and Gillian. She is among the first and I don’t believe it’s because she’s the writer’s girlfriend. (?) There is something and can’t wait to find out.
There is something, for sure, and for my own sanity, I need to find out what it is!
When did Gillian refer to David as her partner??? I must have missed it! I hope it is true.
It is true. And it is here: http://justholdinghandsok.tumblr.com/post/158165491506/gillian-anderson-jennifer-nadel-and-paul
Actually, I just read the whole ‘if I was single’ quote and it does seem like it can be taken eitger way. Like, if I was a single with no kids (trying to make it relatable to single childless women) or if I was a single with no kids (I currently am seeing someone and already have kids). They both make sense. I’ve changed my mind. I don’t think we’ll see any confirmation anytime soon. And when it doesn’t, people in the fandom will argue over those two inferences. (1)
Basically, in the first inference, GA is putting herself in the shoes of a childless single woman. If I was xyz(you) I would do this. The second inference is a hypothetical contrary to the current scenario. If I was single right now and was childless, I would do this. The second one gurantees that she’s dating someone. The first not necessarily. So, it can be taken either way. Though I am tilting slightly towards her slipping it in that she’s not single anymore.
–
That’s a lot of mind-twisting 🙂 I think she’s not single, that’s what she meant.
The thing is, it’s a written interview, so we will never know. Things get added to written interviews, Elle isn’t a very cautious and serious paper, so there’s also a possibility she’d never pronounced those words. It’s possible she only mentioned her kids, and the journalists made a little addition based on what they thought they knew, on what they read or whatever. Who knows!





