People are shouting all kinds of shit at me because I believed in Gillovny on a whim, but refuse to believe David is with a child, when apparently, there’s is « proof » but never proof of Gillovny! (Which there was) I always refer back to that interview a few months ago where David called the reporter a child. I know he said recently that Piper was an adult. But he was aware of what he was saying then. Unconsciously, he thinks of young girls as children. That’s all I need to know.

In what world shipping Gillovny could be worst than believing David is dating a 24 years old girl? There’s no proof, and even if there was, how could one accept this situation and therefore claim Gillovny as wrong? Don’t let them, anon! Fight back!

Laisser un commentaire